50% increase in BC size too big

Any suggestions or ideas regarding cruiser command
User avatar
Tempest
CCA
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:00 pm
Wiki edits: 17
Location: Michigan, NA

Re: 50% increase in BC size too big

Post by Tempest »

i do love certain aspects of the size increase, i'd think even a 10% reduction of size is good. Just to keep the scale of ship size in comparison to a destroyer decent. But the most important issue as corinth agreed is the passing through the bc, i agree that not one ship should be able to pass through the bc after the deployment invuln. Miners even can be emped to prevent a dock, however if they are hiding inside the bc all they have to do is wait.
Games are only as Fun as Who you play them with

-Join CCA!
Weyoun
ZergCC
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 10:00 pm
Wiki edits: 0

Re: 50% increase in BC size too big

Post by Weyoun »

why not just keep the bc big, and prevent small ship overlap after undock?
All these teeth, I, will, evolve a toothbrush.
User avatar
zakhennahr
CCA
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:00 pm
Wiki edits: 33

Re: 50% increase in BC size too big

Post by zakhennahr »

Please realize everyone that actual BC area was not increased by 50%. Radius was increased by 50%.

In total, area size of BC increased to 225% its original size (1.5^2). Perhaps something like a 40% increase would have been better, as that would double the area of the bc approximately.
Post Reply