50% increase in BC size too big
Re: 50% increase in BC size too big
i do love certain aspects of the size increase, i'd think even a 10% reduction of size is good. Just to keep the scale of ship size in comparison to a destroyer decent. But the most important issue as corinth agreed is the passing through the bc, i agree that not one ship should be able to pass through the bc after the deployment invuln. Miners even can be emped to prevent a dock, however if they are hiding inside the bc all they have to do is wait.
Games are only as Fun as Who you play them with
-Join CCA!
-Join CCA!
Re: 50% increase in BC size too big
why not just keep the bc big, and prevent small ship overlap after undock?
All these teeth, I, will, evolve a toothbrush.
- zakhennahr
- CCA
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:00 pm
- Wiki edits: 33
Re: 50% increase in BC size too big
Please realize everyone that actual BC area was not increased by 50%. Radius was increased by 50%.
In total, area size of BC increased to 225% its original size (1.5^2). Perhaps something like a 40% increase would have been better, as that would double the area of the bc approximately.
In total, area size of BC increased to 225% its original size (1.5^2). Perhaps something like a 40% increase would have been better, as that would double the area of the bc approximately.